Juicing is growing rapidly as a lifestyle choice and more and more people are researching online to inform their choices when selecting products. At the same time manufacturers are in a race to persuade people that their juicer is the best offering, competing with ‘new features’ that supposedly deliver increasingly better results. Sometimes it’s not easy to tell what features are genuinely beneficial and what is just marketing hype.
If you are researching buying an electric juicer there are quite a few sources of information on the web that promote pseudo-science to try and persuade you that one particular model is the ultimate ‘must-have’ machine. Here are some of the unproven claims that you will probably come across.
Juicer common Myths
High-Speed Centrifugal Juicers Destroy Enzymes
Centrifugal Juicers DEFINITELY DO NOT DESTROY ENZYMES. This is pure fantasy and it’s become a great marketing ploy for some people who sell masticating juicers. Even we used to accept this unproven scare-mongering because it was so widely repeated by eminently respectable people. Max Gerson contributed to this myth with his claims about the oxidation of enzymes by Centrifugal Juicers but although the Gerson Therapy is widely respected, no scientific evidence supporting the idea that Centrifugal Juicers destroy enzymes is available.
Basic research published by Michael Donaldson Ph.D. has shown that there is significant enzyme activity in the juice from various models of centrifugal juicers. Some websites claim that the high-speed friction in a centrifugal juicer heats the enzymes and kills them. Some claim that the high speed tears the enzyme molecules apart. This is all unproven nonsense. For a juicer to kill enzymes the resulting juice would have to be heated well above blood temperature and no juicer we’ve yet tested does that.
Masticating juicers do extract greater amounts of some nutrients, so if getting the best juice quality is the number one priority you can find out about the differences between masticating juicers in our choosing a juicer section. But you shouldn’t be scared into spending hundreds of pounds on a masticating juicer because of the myth that centrifugal juicers produce poor quality juice with no enzymes. Centrifugal juicers are the most common and popular choice and they offer great health benefits when used regularly. A very user-friendly example of this type of juice extractor is the Sage Nutri Juicer Cold Plus. The best feature of most good quality centrifugal juicers is that they are quick and easy to use and a small compromise in overall performance is often acceptable in a busy household where juicing needs to happen fast.
A Slower Juicer Gives Better Juice and More Juice
This is sort of true, but people then get caught up in a search for the slowest turning juicer in the belief that it will give more nutritious juice. Twin Gear and Single Auger Masticating Juicers work better at low speeds because of their juicing action. All masticating juicers give a more nutritious juice by breaking down the fiber of the fruit and vegetables more thoroughly, releasing more nutrients into the juice. They do this because of their chewing and grinding action, not because of how slowly they must work. If you had to choose between a model that turns at 100 RPM and one that turns at 50 RPM will the slower one give more nutritious juice? No, because nutrient extraction is about much more than speed alone.
There are two main factors that determine juice yield and juice quality. First, there is the degree to which the ingredients are broken down by the juicing process and second is the force used to separate the juice from the pulp. Masticating juicers that are capable of juicing greens and wheatgrass as well as other ingredients are able to do so because they break down these fine leaves thoroughly by passing them through a smaller gap between the juicing parts. To do this without creating too much heat and friction, these juicers have to operate slowly. The speed is a design limitation – it is not a key feature! But now manufacturers are in a backward race to make their juicers turn more slowly than everybody else’s!
The quantity of juice extracted is determined by the pressure or force used to extract it. In masticating juicers, this force is created by the size of the pulp outlet and in a centrifugal juicer, it’s the rotational speed that creates the centrifugal force to separate out the juice. Even the humble centrifugal delivers a very high yield of juice from most hard fleshed ingredients. In most cases, the difference in juice yield, just like the difference in juice quality, is not huge. Low-speed juicers may be a bit more versatile, but in most cases, there is a price to pay in the time you spend juicing. If you are choosing a low-speed juicer, whether is turns at 40, 80, 90, or 180 revs is not going to be a significant factor in determining juice yield and juice quality.
Twin Gear Juicers with Bio-Magnets Improve Juice Quality and Shelf Life
This unproven claim is made by juicer manufacturers who have ‘bio-ceramic magnets’ in their twin gear juicers. They say that the effect of these magnets is to increase the longevity and “vitality” of the juice. Unfortunately, there are no credible scientific studies that we can find on the topic of bio-magnets and their effects on food and health.
It’s a real shame that such pseudo-science finds its way into the marketing material that twin gear manufacturers produce because twin gear machines do actually offer a more nutritious juice. They do this because they break down plant fibers more thoroughly than other juicers and release the nutrients under higher pressure. They don’t work better because of the dubious concept of bio-ceramic magnets performing some mystical jiggery-pokery in the juice molecules!
A Twin Gear Juicer can be a good choice for people who are aiming primarily for maximum nutrition from their juicer. For this reason, they are often recommended by nutritional therapists to people combatting ill health. Green Star Juicers are popular choices. For a tiny compromise in results, consumers can make a huge saving in time spent by going for one of the newer type Vertical Slow Juicers which turn the traditional auger type juicer into a much more user-friendly device – one that is easier to live with than a Twin Gear model.
Other Misleading Claims
In the rush to present supposedly new features that will set one juicer apart from the crowd, manufacturers come up with all sorts of meaningless terms and bogus data. Vague and ill-defined terms like “90% more nutrient extraction than other juicers”, “80% more enzymes” or “50% less pulp” are meaningless unless proper independent testing has verified such comparisons.
Lots of single auger juicer brands are now moving towards using GE Ultem material in the augers, offering the alleged advantage that this material is ‘up to 8 times harder than other augers’. That sounds like a good feature but to some extent, it’s offering a solution to a juicer problem that doesn’t exist. So far we have had very few problems with juicer augers that are made from other materials, so although it sounds like a plus, is a GE Ultem auger a big step forward? It sounds reassuring though and perhaps reassurance that you are buying the best materials does have a value.
Some manufacturers state that the auger has a “dual” or “triple stage pressing action”, because of the variations in the profile of the auger and juicing screen. You might expect that more pressing stages means more juice but in reality, the difference in juice yield from different auger juicer brands is relatively small if you steer clear of Chinese knock off brands. When manufacturers are continually trying to gain an edge on the competition, consumers are having to sift through more and more new ‘must-have features’ so that they can have confidence in their buying choice. Arbitrarily dividing up the juicing process into more ‘stages’ than your competitor is kind of like gents razor manufacturers continuing to add more blades – after a certain point, there is no genuine advantage.
Another popular point of competition for different brands is the length of the product warranty. The logic behind this is that the longer the warranty, the longer the juicer machine will last and therefore the perception is that the quality of the machine must be better. This is categorically not so. A warranty covers for faults and defects but it doesn’t cover for wear and tear or accidental damage. Long warranties mostly cover the motor only and most induction motors are very reliable in any case, regardless of which brand you choose. The length of the warranty period does not reflect the build quality or reliability of the machine; it reflects how far the brand will go to win your confidence, and the cost of supporting the warranty is usually built into the juicer price.